Home page > Geography & Topography > Muslim academic sliced out sections of priceless collection

Muslim academic sliced out sections of priceless collection

Saturday 22 November 2008

Source: Guardian.

JPEG - 24.5 kb
Farhad Hakimzadeh
Harvard-educated Farhad Hakimzadeh, 60, used a Stanley knife to cut out pages, plates and maps from up to 150 historic books.

To the untrained eye the damage is barely visible. Yet within the handbound pages of books charting how Europeans travelled to Mesopotamia, Persia and the Mogul empire from the 16th century onwards, the damage caused by one Iranian academic to a priceless British Library collection is irreversible.

Leading scholars at the library are at a loss to explain why Farhad Hakimzadeh, a Harvard-educated businessman and publisher, took a scalpel to the leaves of 150 books that have been in the nation’s collection for centuries. The monetary damage he caused over seven years is in the region of £400,000 but Dr Kristian Jensen, head of the British and early printed collections at the library, said no price could be placed upon the books and maps that he had defaced and stolen.

«These are historic objects which have been damaged forever», said Jensen. «You cannot undo what he has done and it has compromised a piece of historical evidence which charts the early engagement of Europeans with what we now know as the Middle East and China.»

«It makes me extremely angry. This is someone who is extremely rich who has damaged and destroyed something that belongs to everybody.»

Hakimzadeh, 60, faces a jail sentence today when he appears at Wood Green magistrates court in London. The Muslim, Iranian-born academic left his country after the fall of the Shah and holds a US passport. He has pleaded guilty to 14 specimen charges of stealing maps, pages and illustrations from 10 books at the British Library and four from the Bodleian Library in Oxford dating back to 1998.

Hakimzadeh was the CEO of UK charity Iran Heritage Foundation (IHF). IHF is believed to be a Para vent for propaganda activities of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

1 Message

  • Im sorry but what on earth is the relevance of this man being a Muslim? This stories title and reference to this mans religeon in the main body of the text has nothing to do with the content and purpose of the story. Futhermore, the fact that the story explains that the man Farhad Hakimzadeh fled Iran when the shah was overthrown would strongly indicate that he was not a muslim atall, perhaps this journalist felt Iranian national by default means a muslim. I have no problem with a news story talking about and critisizing people with some relevant problem deriving from someones religeon, for instance radical extremism among young muslims. However the mention of religeon here seems to simply further a derogatory attitude that many people hold against muslims, one that is very much fed by references such as the one made in this article. With due respect to the website host and the journslist themselves, this is very shoddy and irritating journalism.

    Reply to this message

Reply to this news item

SPIP | template | | Site Map | Tree | Follow-up of the site's activity RSS 2.0