Book Review

The Afghans

Willem VOGELSANG

Friday 23 January 2004, by George LANE

The Peoples of Asia. x, 382 pp.

Oxford Blackwell, 2001.

the AfghansWillem Vogelsang’s study of Afghanistan and the Afghans went to press just before the events of September 11 2001, and the subsequent repercussions for Afghanistan are addressed only briefly in the preface. However, this in no way detracts from the value of this book, by an eminent Leiden scholar, as a comprehensive overview of Afghanistan’s history and peoples from ancient times to the modem era.

Vogelsang’s deep knowledge of and interest in archaeology and ancient “Iran” are reflected in the chapters he devotes to the Indo-Iranian invasions of the second millennium BCE, the Persian Achaenienids, and the advent of Hellenism in the wake of Alexander. For Vogelsang, Alexander’s campaigns in Afghanistan were particularly important in view of the number of geographers, botanists, historians, biographers and others [who] collected a wealth of information about the campaign itself and about the terrain and the people the Macedonians"“encountered” (p. l 16). Forty per cent of the book is devoted to pre-Islamic Afghanistan, a period often marginalized in studies of medieval and modern history.

The term “Afghan” is first unambiguously recorded in the tenth century Persian work; the Hudud al Alam, and it becomes a common, terminl the histories and travelogues of the medieval period. It would seem generally to refer to the Pathan tribes, though it sometimes encompasses all tribes, inhabiting the Hindu Kush mountain region. Vogelsang commits more space to examining the Pathans than to the other ethnic groups that make up Afghanistan no doubt because the Pathans have always been the dominant group in the area and account for between 40 and 50 per cent of the population. However, space is given to such little-known groups as the Aymaq and Pasha’i speaking Dihgan.

Post-Islamic conquest history and the modern era are covered in nine well footnoted chapters, while the advent of Islam is discussed in one revealing chapter depicting Afghanistan from the mid-seventh century until the midninth century as a battlefield, shared by Arabs, Chinese and Tibetans fighting for control of the Silk Road and the passes between east and west. It is often forgotten that Afghanistan is more a Central Asian rather than Middle Eastern state.

Chapters covering the Islamic period and the modern era are of necessity narrative in style and afford only an outline of events. Footnotes are provided for scholars interested in additional research and the ample thirty pages of bibliography supply much food for further scholarly pursuit. However, for what is in many ways an historical account, there is a noticeable lack, either listed or cited primary source material, much of which is now readily available in edited and translated form.

Willem Vogelsang has written a comprehensive overview of a region now very much in the public eye and the welcome result is a readable, lucid and easily accessible guide to ways in many ways is a painfully complex subject.

1 Message

  • The Afghans 2 January 2009 19:22, by Kawa

    BS. The Afghans are originally from the Indian world and were not related with modern ’’Afghans’’ which have again another meaning (Hazaras, Tajiks (Persians), Uzbeks etc....). The ancient ’’Afghans’’, called by the chronists as Ashvakas or Ashavakans were living in modern Pakistan as nomads. Modern Afghans, in the sense of Pashtuns or Pathans are not the same ’’Afghans’’ as the ancient ’’Afghans’’->Ashvakas (Horse people->from Assa, Assi; in Iranic languages Aspa, Aspi). Modern Pashtuns or Pathans are a confederation of many tribes with different origines, included Turks, Mongols, Arabs, Sindhis, Punjabis, Huns, Chinese and Hephtalithes as Vihara count them to the ’’Avagana’’ tribes. The Persians and the Kushans used the term Apkans and Apagans to designate those lose confederation. Neverlessness, it is important to know that the term ’’Afghan’’ was given to them by invaders and foreigners, the same goes for Pathan. Possibly, the term ’’Pashtun’’ drives from ’’Pactyan’’, an vedic-speaking tribe eastward of ancient Kabulvalley, near Arachosia and Gandhara, but since modern Pashtuns speak more or lesser an ’’Iranic’’ language, we can assume, that they only adoptet their name, possibly assimilated them even, but have forget that event, the roots of the name Pashtun and when they did they absorbed as invaders in the lands or the Paktians those population. Also their faith was not comparable with the later ’’Afghans’’ who were mentioned by Al-Biruni as pagans (not Hindus, not Muslims or Zoroastrians, but pagans, similar to the people of Kalash and Nuristan). All these tribes had one thing in common, if not their origine, they were all of nomadic background who allied themself to protect themself from invaders and emperors like Persians and their descandants. The Pashtun nation found it’s highest pick and with it it’s succes in the 16th/17th century, when different tribes developed a common language, based on Turkic, Arabic, Persian (the most heaviest influence on Pashtu language), Urdu, Hindustani, Sindhi etc. Modern Pashtuns, also sometimes called as ’’real Afghans’’ are still dominantly nomads and tough they share their name as citizen of Afghanistan and the name of the country with other tribes (Tajiks etc.), they are kindly not related with the Non-Pashtuns who are cultural, historical, lingual and by faith different than them. Even among themself, the Pathans/Pashtuns have different history of their origine. F.ex. are the Ghalzai Pashtuns descandants of the Khalji Turks, the Abdalis possibly of the Hephtalithe Turks who fled from Central Asia to South-East Asia where they again established a short-living dynasty where the rulers were known as beeing wild than the worsest animals, the Barakzais, Kharotis, Jadrans, Mangals... are of Mongol descandts (Baraca, Kareit, Jadaran/Jadarin) who just became mixed with the local people and other by time ’’Aryanized’’ tribes.

    See online : The Afghans

    Reply to this message

Reply to this article

SPIP | template | | Site Map | Tree | Follow-up of the site's activity RSS 2.0