Home page > Geography & Topography > I am Tajik, not Afghan

Opinion

I am Tajik, not Afghan

Before the invention of the “Afghanistan”, the land used to be known as Ariana and Khorasan

Tuesday 5 February 2008, by Tajikam Team

There are many ways to oppress people. One way is by taking away their identity. Afghanistan as a country of different ethnicities has always seemed to be troubled with its identities, yet another taboo topic amongst the people.

The threat of being called a “traitor” and a “foreigner” hangs over those who dare tread upon the topic of national identity. For the longest time, the term “Afghan” has been pushed upon every ethnic group of Afghanistan and for years, that is what Tajiks, Hazaras, Uzbeks, Turkmans, and other non-Pashtuns were known by the rest of the world. Today, however, it needs to be made clear that “Afghan” is not the rightful national identity for the country.

The history behind the word “Afghan” is disputable due to various sources of where it originated from. However, one thing is clear: “Afghan” has always been synonymous with Pashtun. Writers and travellers to and from the country have stated that the word “Afghan” was always used to distinguish between the Pashtuns and non-Pashtuns such as the Tajiks, Hazaras, etc. The name of country is believed to have been given by the British when they first invaded it in the 19th century. The areas that they encountered were predominantly Pashtun and since they knew “Afghan” as synonymous with “Pashtun”. They therefore erroneously declared the entire country as “Land of the Afghan” or Afghanistan. And even though the majority of Afghanistan isn’t even Afghans, the name has stuck since then.

Before the invention of the “Afghanistan”, the land used to be known as other names: Ariana and Khorasan, with the most recent being Khorasan. The region was called Khorasan for 1500 years and the name was fairer and represented the state as well as the people better. It clearly doesn’t favour one ethnicity over another. As Khorasan, the region was once an advancing civilization and embodied many ethnicities. However, as the Pashtun nomads entered and invaded the regions, they scattered and spread over, imposing their existence as well as a need for a country.

Now, it doesn’t take a Ph.D. — self-taught or not — to figure out that those events were not just. And no matter what changes the country and the people have gone through, the term “Afghan” is not a legitimate one. Tajiks and Hazaras and Uzbeks and other non-Pashtuns were never and will never be Afghan. When the literal term of a word obviously means something you are not why would you be crazy enough to fight for the right to be called one? By non-Pashtuns adamantly choosing to call themselves Afghan just because they want peace and quiet, they are inadvertently throwing their rights and their heritage away. Losing your identity as a Hazara or a Tajik, Uzbek, or Turkman, you are being oppressed and your heritage and history is being rewritten to those who crawled out of the Suleiman Mountains. When you don’t even speak the language of an Afghan (supposedly Pashto) then why call yourself one?

There are a lot of people that will threaten you if you refuse to call yourself an Afghan when you aren’t one. They will call you a “traitor” or “foreigner” and try to get the mass against you. There is a full culture and history behind the names of “Tajik” and “Hazara”, etc. When the world thinks of “Afghans” hardly anything good will come to mind. It is often associated with the horrors of Ahmad Shah Abdali, paedophilia, the Taliban, and now drug dealers. Though there are some bad within non-Pashtuns, they, however, have contributed greatly to the world and to civilization. When you begin to associate yourself with what you rightfully are, you will see just how rich your past is. Rumi, Avicenna, Ferdowsi, they were not Afghans and would never have called themselves one.

The national identity is constantly surrounded by lies and deceit. Pashto is trying to be pushed upon those who have no need for it, the word Afghan is insisted upon even though the majority of Afghanistan isn’t even Pashtun. Afghans have always and will always be known as Pashtuns only. A Tajik and an Uzbek and other non-Pashtuns are separate and they should be known as separate. When this comes to light, only then will the people be able to gain the rest of their rights. Only then will the name of the country be forced to change because it isn’t a fair representation of the majority of the people. The people who don’t wish to call themselves Afghan are not trying to start trouble. Instead, they have opened their eyes and trying to open the eyes of others to the mistake and the lie that has covered the entire people. Issues like these need to be discussed because even though they might seem minor, they are in fact major. If the name non-Pashtuns choose to call themselves isn’t such a “big deal” then why are people trying so hard to fight those that decline the name Afghan?

26 Forum messages

  • I am Tajik, not Afghan 8 February 2008 16:23

    Why with paedophilia?

    Reply to this message

    • I am Tajik, not Afghan 11 July 2010 22:03

      If majority ethnic group in afghanistan is not pashtun then which one is majority? Could you clerify. Calling pashtun nomads which are part of present day afghanistan and defending your ancentor 1000000 years ago does not make sense. One more thing, Afghanistan was not founded in 19th century, rather 18 century much before british.

      Reply to this message

      • I am Tajik, not Afghan 31 December 2010 09:49, by aziz

        Tajiks and Pashtuns are in equal amounts 38-39% of Afghnaistans populations each (total together 76-78%).

        Reply to this message

      • I am Tajik, not Afghan 15 January 2012 23:11, by Tobe

        PLEASE SHOW AN OFFICAL SURVEY CONDUCTED BY INTERNATIONAL SOURCES (UN OR OTHER AGENCY) THAT SHOWS THAT PASHTUNS ARE THE MAJORITY. let me remind of one thing, afghanistan has been in war since it was created and there was never a survey done that shows that pashtuns are the majority. BUT I CAN DEF. SHOW YOU OFFICAL SURVEYS THAT SHOW "MINORITIES" (uzbeks, tajiks, hazaras) as being majority.

        i agree with the author of this article. indeed, our national identities are being taken away from us when we non-pashtuns are refered to us Afghans. This matter is so controversial BUT we will never be permitted to change the name of AFGHANISTAN unless the ethnic groups divide (which is very unlikely).
        HENCE ARGUING OVER THIS ISSUE IS USELESS.

        we are all aware that the tajik/persian/uzbek and all other cultures are alot more modernized compared to the pashtun culture because we have had scholars unlike pastuns who are recentely introduced to literacy.

        but now we have to keep in mind that we cant solve this problem. we must strengthen our country in other ways ie. infra structures.

        Reply to this message

  • I am Tajik, not Afghan 4 November 2010 23:18, by Hazar

    The land was before called Ariana or Khorasan... so where’s the big deal?
    It is a futile and pointless issue...
    this is never going to solve any problem we are facing today in Afhganistan.
    I think it is only going to divide the Afghans more than they already are.
    And besides...everybody is happy to be called and known as Afghan.

    Reply to this message

  • I am Tajik, not Afghan 4 April 2011 14:33

    how can pashtuns prove that they were in afghanistan first
    i think hazaras were before any other ethnic groups
    because of what is left in afghanistan today
    Bud Bamyan proves which is really old and was built by hazaras
    and Afghanistan is not a proper name for that country
    as long as it remains like that there will never be national unity
    nd that means no peace

    Reply to this message

  • I am Tajik, not Afghan 4 April 2011 18:02, by Mustafa

    I will be honest I don’t like this article not because i don’t agree with the narrator but simply because this article brings the biggest issue of Afghanistan up! I am an Afghan raised in Germany and studying in the US right now...and over time i learned all the hatred that was going on in our country was just simply RACISM against our own!
    My Parents are half Pastun and half Tajik....but never ever has anyone one told me that their race is superior to the other!
    The simple statement i am trying to make here is that it doesnt matter who was first and who wasnt...and who did what and who didnt....its prolly better just to accept everyone as we are. For me there is no Hazara, Tajik or Pastun...ect......there is just Afghans!!

    Reply to this message

    • I am Tajik, not Afghan 28 April 2011 15:21, by Aria

      The traditions of the Afghan people refer them to Syria as their country of residence.They were carried away in captivity by Bukhtunasar.
      At some period they subcequently emegrated eastward into the mountainous country of Ghor. Were they were called by neighboring peoples " Bani Afghan, and And "Bani Isreal," or children of Afghan and children of Israel. In corroboration testimony of the prophet Esdras the ten tribes of Israel, who were carried into captivity, subsequently escaped and found refuge.

      Descent: The origins of Qais
      Settled in the Ghor country, to the east of Herat, at the time that Muhammad announced his mission as the Prophet of God-about 622 A. D.
      Khalid-bin-walid, a chief of Curesh tribe of Arabs came to them with the tidings of the new faith and to join the Prophets standard. The mission of Khalid was not without success, returned to the Prophet, accompanied by a deputation of six or seven representative men their followers in amounting to seventy six persons. The chief leader of this party was Qais .At the same time the Prophet, as a mark of special favor and distinction to change the Hebrew name of Qias to the Arab one of Abdur Rashid-" the servant of the true guide "-and, exhorting him to strive in the conversion of his people, conferred on him the title of-" Pahtan "-a Syrian word signifying the rudder of a ship as new proselyte was henceforth to be the guide of -his people in the way they should go.

      The Afghans are a distinct people among several other peoples, who together compose the mixed population of the country which is now named after them. They call themselves "Bani Israel," and trace their descent horn King Saul (Malik Talut) in regular succesion down to Kais or Kaish”
      Henry Walter Bellew1880

      Reply to this message

      • I am Tajik, not Afghan 14 October 2011 01:21, by Ahura

        That is BS! DNA testing has proved that this theory is full of crap from racists like you.

        The Pashtuns are mentioned in Rigveda and other ancient texts.

        I don really need to argue with what seems to be an idiot racist, I will just tell you one thing, go and study about Pashtu language and it shall tell you the history of the people.

        Articles like these are not good on a website like this, this is a shame.

        Reply to this message

  • I am Afghan 6 June 2012 17:36, by Afghannn

    Going by this logic then no American can call himself American, because some are descended from English some from France some from Ireland, but all call themselves American every country has different types of people but, the strongest and successful ones are the united ones, if we are divided it causes problems iam an afghan first, even though I speak farci and not Pashto, my parents and grandparents where born in Afghanistan so was I, do iam 100% afghan

    Reply to this message

    • You are clearly mistaken . American doesn’t denote one ethnicity . American is not an ethnicity but a nationality . Afghan is historically and currently a synonym for Pashtun . Pashtun is the largest ethnic minority in Afghanistan , not the majority meaning they comprise of 38-40 percent of the population . Therefore, for strong nationalism to take place a new name should replace the current so that all ethnicities can feel a sense of belonging . Even Ahmad shah abdali, when he captured qandahar declared himself king of khorasan .

      Reply to this message

  • I am Tajik, not Afghan 8 June 2012 17:34, by OT

    Well the Persian Ableruni who wrote a book on India in the tenth century writes about the Shahi Hindu kings of Afghanistan with great respect and says they were just rulers, Afghanistan was also an extension of greater Hindu Buddhist Kashmir. Panini the Sanskrit grammarian and the world’s first grammarian came from there and speaks of the river in Kabul....The purest Sanskrit was once spoken in Afghanistan, our princess of the Mahabharata is a Gandhari princess, i.e. from Kandahar. Before Islam, the borders of Persia and India were fluid and constantly redrawn. Th entire Hindu Buddhist kingdoms were wiped out in Afghanistan, naturally people there have no memory of this anymore as they a different peoples today...the glory of the Shahi kings of Afghanistan are also mentioned by Kahlan who wrote the first Sanskritmhistory of Kashmir....Zoroaster also came from what is Afghanistan, it was an ancient aryan heartland, and the seat of Dharma....today it is something different.....

    Reply to this message

  • I am Tajik, not Afghan 8 June 2012 18:29, by OT

    Also, the reason Middle Easterners are so disturbed in terms of history and identity is that they are in complete amnesia about their preIslamic history, hence I noticed Persians thinking they are the same thing as Germans and what not. Islam has a tendency to destroy what went before it, so now these peoples are in a confused state as to who they were before the sixth century. Do you think Afghans know of the Shahi Kings or how Afghanistan was once a center of the confluence of Hinduism, Buddhism and Zoroastrianism? Moreover, the Aryan thing is ridiculous, and connotes a Dharmic way of thinking....no connection between Germans and Iranians, the Germans came to civilization much later after adopting Greco Roman culture and were seen as barbarians by Greeks and Romans....however, before Islam there was not much difference between the Romans, Persians and the north Indian frontier as these kingdoms were constantly drawn and redrawn, these peoples had a different religious mindset....However, Romans became different after they became Christian as well and when Persia became Islamic and the Romans Christian you have a separation between East and West, before there was a lot of give and take and exchange. Moreover, there were Gerco -Buddhist kingdoms in Afghanistan in what was known as Bactria, showing the ancients were in conflict as regards kingdoms, wealth and territory but there was not religious conflict. These kingdoms were destroyed by barbaric Huns....Religious conflict is Judiasm’s, Islam’s and Christianity’s gift to the world, all three like to impose themselves on others and place themselves on top. Afghans, Iranians and other would live in harmony if they learned their history properly and see that this region was plural in terms of religion once upon a time and that Zoroastrians, Buddhists and Hindus interacted with each other in what is today Afghanistan, and while kings fought to expand territory, they did not fight to impose religion on others. Religious pluralism is also Persian in that Cyrus allowed the freedom of religion in this empire, this is what I understand by Aryan, a sense of fair play and placing truth as the highest, Aryan is equal to Dharma and this is the light of the East..... Afghanistan has a glorious past as the confluence of the centers of Zoroastrianism, Buddhsim and Hinduism, will they ever be able to recover and understand their past or will they always be mired in religious conflict?

    Reply to this message

  • I am Tajik, not Afghan 27 June 2012 22:12

    pashton are nomad from Israel generation as long as they exist in afg there will be no peace ever. they always sold their land to foreigner and they have never been honest to their country . now no one should think anything now that we are pashton or tajik ,,,etc . everything is over just try to help our conutry from brain washed people of border made by pakistan .

    Reply to this message

  • I am an Afghan, and proud! 7 August 2012 03:27, by Mina

    Dear writer of "I am Tajik, not Afghan,"

    I thought I’d make the following points before leaving this website and article forever:

    //This forum is moderated beforehand: your contribution will only appear after being validated by a site administrator.//

    1. So much for freedom of speech with that one ^

    2. To whoever wrote the article:
    You obviously have way too much time on your hands and not a source in sight. Cite your sources, don’t pull stuff out of your behind and state them as if they’re the Almighty’s own words. It just goes to show you’re full of what Americans call "bull shit" ...

    4. If you’re going to call yourself "Tajik" then by all means please navigate your little self into Tajikistan and leave those who call themselves "Afghan" in Afghanistan alone. I believe Afghans have much more important matters to attend to than to pay attention to a couple of idiots with their pride so hurt they’ve chose to stick their heads far up into their behinds.

    I mean come on, ever heard of such issues such as child rape? How about female genital mutilation? Or... wait for it ... prostitution in Afghanistan AND Tajikistan? Or ... what about something called poverty and malnourished children? Choose what you spend your time on wisely my friends and please stop spreading hate, it helps nobody.

    Regards,

    Your Afghan sister

    Reply to this message

    • I am an Afghan, and proud! 2 February 09:41

      Then stop being a racist afghan and allow others to claim their ethnicity . This website bothers your racist afghan pride , allow people to take pride in who they are and stop depriving and criticizing them of it .

      Tajiks Without Borders , Zack

      Reply to this message

    • I am an Afghan, and proud! 2 February 09:43

      Then stop being a racist afghan and allow others to claim their ethnicity . This website bothers your racist afghan pride , allow people to take pride in who they are and stop depriving and criticizing them of it .

      Tajiks Without Borders , Zack

      Reply to this message

    • I am an Afghan, and proud! 13 April 09:15

      You are right,those kind of people who always try to create troubles among Afghans on ethnic bases,good for nothing,highly prejudiced people never talked about the real issues of Afghanistan.

      Afghanistan is in trouble because of the people like this gentelman,they dont care about education,technology,intelligence,unity,all what they care for is the NAME AFGHANISTAN should be changed...

      I think Afghans should go tough with those kind of people,majority of them are not even Afghans,they are Intelligence agents of Iran...

      It was AFGHANISTAN,It is Afghanistan and It will remain as Afghanistan

      Reply to this message

  • I am Tajik, not Afghan 8 August 2012 13:59, by ناموس

    دم تکانندگان خوش رقص فرنگی پرست لختی بيانديشند
    ما همه بديم که فرزندان گجسته الکسندر خوب باشند
    از لولو و باکتری که بگذريم، سخن حماسه سپاهانيان نکوست
    http://www.mehrnews.com/fa/newsdeta...

    Reply to this message

  • Afghanistan 12 September 2012 20:40, by ahmad yasir

    no pashtun
    no tajik
    no uzbek
    no hazara
    only afghan

    Reply to this message

    • Afghanistan 21 November 2012 00:34, by Dukhtar-e-Herati

      PLEASE show me the last time a Tajik or Hazara was an elected to run the country, a notable followed official in Power???? I rest my CASE. U must be Pashtun you idiot.

      Reply to this message

  • I am Tajik, not Afghan 21 November 2012 00:32, by Dukhtar-e-Herati

    I dont believe we can divide the nation since most Tajiks, unfortunately who did not hold strong values married Pashtuns, therefore with intermarriages and such it is difficult to seperate people, but I DO believe people of each ethnicity should celebrate and be entitled to their traditions and language. Unfortunately in Afghanistan we are all forced to follow the "Afghan" traditions such as the Pashtun traditions where we are forced to learn Pashto in Schools, wear the ugly big traditional garments and do attans to portray our nationalism when as Tajiks, Uzbeks and Chechens that is not part of our traditions.

    Most Tajiks dont even know their identity and even get offended because they want to be part of the majority and do not want people to look down at them or for them to feel like an outcast, especially the older generation who boast on being "Afghan" when they are not. This is an issue which young people need to bring into awareness. It is not that we are stomping on the traditions of Afghanistan but taking our rights to celebrate and the freedom to choose how to express ourselves. To have the freedom and support to celebrate and be who we are and to be accepted is the GOAL. PLease let me know if you would like to start a petition to change the name of Afghanistan "the land of Pashtuns" back to Ariana so that it represents all people and ethnicities where people can start having the freedoms they are entitled to.

    Those who are saying that the majority is not Pashtun, PLEASE show me the last time a Tajik or Hazara was an elected to run the country, a notable followed official in Power???? I rest my CASE.

    Reply to this message

    • I am Tajik, not Afghan 9 April 13:50, by Es

      Please do start a petition. A lot of ignorance can be washed out JUST by changing the name of the country! Let me know how I can access it, althought the chances of success due to barbaric Pashtun politicians are small. Once Karzai is booted, I pray to life for a Tajik (or even Hazara or Uzbek) leader. A leader of progress, hence not holding tribal values.

      This may even shed a positive light to the country, as a lot of negativity has been linked to the name Afghanistan within the terms of media etc.

      Reply to this message

  • I am Tajik, not Afghan 24 January 19:03, by rumi

    Afghanistan, as it stands today, is truly the land of the pakhtun. The national anthem is in pashto & thank-god not in dari. The thing i hate most about the non-pakhtuns such as the uzbeks, tajiks etc. is that even when they can speak pakhto, they try to make a point by deliberately speaking in their lite-farsi (dari). wots dat all about?

    Reply to this message

    • I am Tajik, not Afghan 13 March 17:00, by John

      Hello all,
      I am sorry you stated that Dari is Tajik language, which isn’t. Dari was invented by Pashtun or Afghan Kings in the 18th century to be used as lingua-franca. Means connecting languages. Tajiks speaks Tajiki, Hazara Hazaragi. etc. Afghans Pashto. Dari is there to connect all those languages. Sort of like Urdu is connecting Punjabi, Sindhi, Baluchi.

      Reply to this message

Reply to this article

SPIP | template | | Site Map | Tree | Follow-up of the site's activity RSS 2.0