Home page > Religion & Theology > Christian and Muslim colonialism

Christian and Muslim colonialism

Stop politics of anti-Hindu minorityism

Tuesday 1 May 2007, by Ravi VARMA

The present successful integration of the Parsi community into the Indian mainstream would not have been possible without the magnanimity extended to them by the local Hindu communities and by the Hindu rulers of Gujarat. That is another shining example of Hinduism in action.

The situation changed dramatically after the entry of European colonial Christianity and the murderous Muslim armies from Mysore led by Hyder Ali and his fanatical son Tipu Sultan into Kerala. This intrusion of hostile outsiders eventually resulted in the degeneration of the mindset and social outlook of the local Christian and Muslim communities.

It should be noted here that both Christians and Muslims in the Hindu kingdoms of Kerala were culturally assimilated with the local traditions and social customs. As such they used to actively participate in the major festivals of the Hindus, even abstaining from cow-slaughter and beef-eating. During the most important occasion of Onam celebrations in Kerala, the Muslims used to visit Hindu homes in the locality wearing Arab costumes and participating in the festivities by performing their traditional dances, with rhythmic beating of hand drums and singing songs in praise of the legendary God Mahabali, locally known as Vairavi Kali. Similarly, the local Christians were also equally active in their participation in Hindu festivals. For instance, during the ceremonial processions of the temple deity at Tripunithura around the surrounding communities for public worship, the Christians of the locality around Karingachira Church in Tripunithura, led by their church, used to light traditional lamps in front of the Church and offer measures of paddy and rice, similar to the practice of Hindus in front of their houses, to honour the deity. A spirit of mutual respect and social amity marked relations between the Hindus and members of the other religions, attesting to the magnanimity of the Hindu community, not by any compulsion or inducement as is the case today. That was Hinduism in action, i.e., Hindutva. However, the situation changed dramatically after the entry of European colonial Christianity and the murderous Muslim armies from Mysore led by Hyder Ali and his fanatical son Tipu Sultan into Kerala. This intrusion of hostile outsiders eventually resulted in the degeneration of the mindsets and social outlook of the local Christian and Muslim communities.

Universality of Hinduism as opposed to narrowness of Islam and Christianity

When Christianity became dominant in the Jewish country of Jerusalem, the neo-Christians began a process of hunting down and chasing out the earlier inhabitants, the generally peace-loving Jewish communities. This, in itself, is an indication that Christianity does not and cannot tolerate other religionists, and, in fact, Christianity has never been committed to universal peace and brotherhood with members of other faiths. Fleeing from the clutches of fanatic Christians, there were many who tried to escape to other countries. One group of Jews fleeing from Jerusalem landed in South India, on the Kerala coast, seeking asylum. The local king at that time, known as the Perumal gave them protection and extended land grants as well as other facilities for their settlement. This was in the first century AD. Since then, Jews have lived in the Hindu state of Kerala, with full freedom to follow their own religion and customs, without any interference from the local Hindu communities. It should be noted here that nowhere in the history of the Jews has there been a similar place in the world where the members of the community were enabled to live free without persecution from the state and local communities. This was to be found only in India, that too in the then Hindu state of Kerala. That is the spirit and practice of Hindutva — Hinduism in action.

Similarly, when the Islamic hordes invaded Persia, which had a great civilisation, heritage and culture, the peaceful followers of Iranian Zoroastrianism were persecuted mercilessly, tortured and massacred, and their fire-temple destroyed, simply in order to eradicate the local traditions and civilisation. This destruction of the local Persian traditions was so complete that only a few thousands of them were able to survive this onslaught. This is Islam in action, an experience that has been repeated worldwide, whether in Pakistan or Bangladesh or Afghanistan, as well as in many other countries. One group of Persians, who did, however, managed to flee from these armies, arrived at the shores of the then Hindu kingdom of Gujarat on the West coast of India and were granted asylum by the local king. These were the forerunners of the present Parsi community in India, a peace-loving and highly enterprising community, who still retain their own customs and traditions. The present successful integration of the Parsi community into the Indian mainstream would not have been possible without the magnanimity extended to them by the local Hindu communities and by the Hindu rulers of Gujarat. That is another shining example of Hinduism in action — Hindutva, which the present-day Christians and Muslims and their mercenary secularist cronies condemn as inhuman!

JPEG - 15 kb
Mahmud of Ghazni
Mahmud of Ghazni (971-1030) was the first sultan of the Ghaznavid dynasty in Afghanistan. A zealous Sunni Moslem, he plundered wealthy India and used the booty to patronize culture in Ghazni, making it the center of Perso-Islamic civilization.
(Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art)

During the late tenth century, Mahmud of Ghazni invaded India with a large Muslim army and vandalised Hindu Gujarat, destroying many temples and pilgrimage centres. With a view to demoralising the local Hindu communities, he targeted important temples such as the one in Somnath, and in fact, destroyed the temple a number of times, even after the temple was rebuilt by the local communities after his departure. In order to further assert their superiority, the Muslims also erected Islamic structures such as mosques on the very spots where temples used to stand, as in the case of Ayodhya, Kashi, Mathura and Delhi. This is Islam in action — intolerant towards all other faiths and traditions and even vengeful on dissidents within its folds!

On similar lines, when Portuguese colonialists invaded Goa and established themselves there in the 16th century, one of their priorities was to spread the European version of Christianity, and with the use of force, engaged in widespread conversions throughout the land. The local temples were destroyed, the Hindus were harassed and humiliated, and Christianity was established. The Pope in the Vatican specially sent to Goa, Francis Xavier, a Jesuit Priest mainly to lead the conversion drive in Goa. Francis Xavier was instrumental in laying waste innumerable Hindu temples, looting and destroying them, and imposing severe restrictions on the local Hindus community by the use of force. His campaign of forcible conversion forced the Brahmins to flee Goa, thereby enabling Francis Xavier to confiscate their properties and enriching the Church. It was his habit to drive local villagers to open public grounds with the help of his band of military ‘volunteers’ and there to declare them as having been converted to Christianity, irrespective of whether the people gathered there wished to or not! This ‘glorious service’ to Christianity by Francis Xavier in the name of the Holy Church was acknowledged by the leaders of the Christian Church, albeit posthumously, by conferring “Sainthood” on him. Thus Francis Xavier became St. Francis Xavier! In this fashion, a Christian saint was specially created for the emancipation of Hindu India, a fitting example of the spirit of Semitic Christianity in action. On similar lines was the creation of a Christian saint especially for the Chinese nation, from among the missionaries that were killed there during the opium wars in China.

When the conversion drive intensified and grew oppressive, thousands of Hindus fled Goa and settled in different parts of what is now known as Karnataka and Maharashtra. One group of Gaud Sarswat Brahmins and Kutumbis from Goa reached the Hindu kingdom of Kochi in present-day Kerala as refugees. In the true spirit of Hinduism, the local King gave them protection and patronage, extending to them land grants as well as facilities for them to engage in trade and other professions. Today, like the Jews in the past, this small community of Konkanis (so-called due to their origins) plays a significant role in the socio-economic life of Kerala. That is the spirit of Hinduism.

Originally, in Malabar (now known as Kerala), it was the members of the poor fishermen community that were converted to Christianity, due to the influence of the earliest Christian missionaries that arrived from the shores of Syria. These Syrian Christians were followers of the Patriarch of Antioch. Not surprisingly, these Christians were assimilated into the local society and there were no communal divides. However, in later years, when the Portuguese discovered that not only were there Christians in Kerala, but also that they were followers of another Christian Church, the Christian missionaries accompanying the Portuguese colonialists decided to use all means to convert these Christians into followers of the Catholic Church headed by the Pope in the Vatican. For this purpose, a Jesuit priest Don Menezes, was specially deputed to Kerala by the Pope in the Vatican. As part of his mission, Don Menezes first tried persuasion and cajoling tactics, but when these proved unsuccessful, he decided to use force. He called for a Synod (a religious gathering of Christians) to held in Udayamperoor near the town of present-day Kochi to be attended by the local Christians. This was resisted by a majority of the local Syrian Christian community, leading to frequent skirmishes and armed conflicts between the two sections of Christians. This gradually escalated to such an extent that priests sent to Kerala from Antioch were even abducted and murdered by members of the Catholic Christian community, at the instigation of the Catholic missionaries. Undaunted, the members of the local and generally peaceful Syrian Christian community took a vow to unitedly oppose the forcible and dubious methods of conversions by the Catholic Christians, at a Christian chapel situated in Mattanchery. This significant event in the history of Syrian Christians in Kerala is known as the Kunam Kurissu Sathyam. Thus the Kunam Kurissu Sathyam is in itself a glaring example of the intolerance of the Catholic Christian Church, and stands, as a stark reminder of a time when conversion drives were forcibly carried out by one Christian community even against another Christian community.

8 Forum messages

  • Christian and Muslim colonialism 30 August 2007 18:54, by William Warda

    The Syrian Christians of Karela were "converted to Christianity, not "due to the influence of the earliest Christian missionaries that arrived from the shores of Syria." They owed their Christianity to the Patriarch of Babylon in Mesopotamia, a denomination which was also called Nestorian by its detractors because it chose to distance itself from the Catholic Church in mid fifth century AD. The term Syrian has three meanings. 1- it means citizen of Syria, 2- A person who speaks the Syriac language. 3- it is short for Assyrian when applied to the Christians of Mesopotamia. The Syrian for the Christians of Karela was in reference to the last two interpretations. Historical documents show that a great number of the Assyrians migrated to Karela during the Persecution periods in their own country.

    Indians of Karela, received a Bishop from the Patriarch of Babylon who served as their religious leader but the portugeese army to force the Christians into Catholicism was able to put an end to this practice and it was for this reason that prompted the "Syrian Christian community to oppose the forcible and dubious methods to force them into Catholic Church.

    For more information about this matter see:

    See online : The Vatican Role in Promoting "Chaldean" as an Ethnic Identity

    Reply to this message

    • Christian and Muslim colonialism 9 March 2012 11:33, by A.Yeshuratnam

      The Synod of Diamper wanted to introduce real Christianiy by removing heresy and other pagan customs. Archbishop Menzes wanted to correct what he termed the lapses and errors of the Indian Christians. Syrian Church in Kerala was functioning rudderless for centuries without any guidance about Christian doctrines, liturgy and church discipline either from Chaldea or Rome.. The two last Syrian bishops were Mar Joseph Sulaka and Mar Abraham; both arrived in Malabar after the arrival of the Portuguese. But their bona fides were under a scanner. Mar Joseph was of a dubious character and he changed sides quite often... After a brief interlude, an imposter named Abraham from Mesopotemia entered Kerala undetected, sent by Simeon the Nestorian Patriarch.This Abraham, through triickery, deception and double- dealing, succeeded in obtaining his nomination and creation as Archbishop Angamale from the pope, with letters to the Archbishop of Goa, and to the Bishop of Cochin dated 27 Feb., 1565.. But soon he returned to Nestorian teaching and practices. To avert a crisis in the Church, Father Valignano, then Superior of the Jesuit Missions, persuaded Mar Abraham in 1583 to assemble a synod. Mar Abraham openly abjured Nestorianism, and professed the Catholic faith, It is against this confused backdrop that we have to analyse the historical decisions of the Synod of Dampier.
      The Synod condemned multitude of Hindu beliefs, especially those related to ’transmigration,’ ’fate’ and ’astrology’ . Since most of the converts were from Hindu untouchable castes, Hindu rituals, superstition and beliefs continued to exist among Christians. The original immigrants who had married untouchable wives and their children were given higher caste status by the rulers. When Francis Xavier visited Kochi there were Mukkuva Christians belonging to Syrian church. But the offspring of untouchable converts in Syrian church followed the heathen practice of purification on touching other Hindu sub castes following Hindu customs. Since ’touching’ , is mentioned in the Synod decision, it is obvious those sub castes were working in the churches or houses of Christians. On the other hand, in Hindu Brahmin and Nair areas the untouchables and subcastes were barred from entry to avoid touch and sight pollution. The Synod condemned such barbarous customs . Lower caste Hindus, especially Ezhavas, Pulayas and Parayas tied thali’ around neck of bride on the occasion of marriage’ The Synod prohibited such practice among Christians. Hardworking labour castes such as Ezhavas, Parayas and carpenters had to take bath after their work before entering their caste temples. The Synod declared it unnecessary. Christians are to remain clean always and can take bath everydat without giving specific time. The Synod condemned all practices of converted untouchables relating to death, puberty and consulting astrolagers but to depend on God’s will. The Synod also condemned distortion of Christian beliefs such as the annunciation of the angel was made in the Temple of Jerusalem which contradicts the Gospel of St. Luke, which says, it was made in Nazareth. The Synod also condemned the following heretical ideas of St. Thomas Christians.
      Joseph had another wife and children when he was betrothed to Mary.
      Child Jesus was reproved for his naughty tricks.
      Child Jesus went to school and learned from them.
      St. Joseph, suspecting Mary of adultery took her to priests, who gave her the water of jealousy to drink; that Mary brought forth with pain, and parting from her company, not being able to go farther, she retired to a stable at Bethlehem.
      None of the saints is in heaven, but are all in a terrestrial paradise, where they should remain till the Day of Judgment.
      Archbishop Menezes was the chief architect of the Synod. He was a sincere Christian who wanted to bring the lost sheep (St. Thomas Christians) to the common Christian fold. He was consecrated Archbishop of Goa in 1595, when he was only 35.In 1612 Aleixo de Menezes was appointed Archbishop of Braga, Portugal. He was viceroy of Portugal during the Iberian Union from 1612 to 1615. He died in 1617, his remains are located at the Populo Church in Braga.

      Reply to this message

      • Christian and Muslim colonialism 23 February 21:01, by Jacob

        Your Knowledge on the history of Early Christianity (Syriac Christianity) seems to be profound. But, you are deliberately trying to misrepresent the ancestry of the Syrian Christians of Kerala, by relating them to the lower castes. This is deception. I’ve noticed that you’ve been trying your level best in establishing your viewpoint that the Syrian Christians are the descendants of the lower castes. Well, from your name, i perceive that you are a Tamil Christian who obviously boasts a lineage of "Untouchables" (As almost all Christians of Tamil Nadu are evidently the descendants of Chakiliyars, Toddy tapping Nadars, Fisherfolks etc who were converted not before the 16nth century by Portuguese missionaries, and later by the British missionaries). So its quite understood that you aren’t very happy to accept the evident ’high caste ancestry’ of the ancient Syrian Christians of Kerala who are also called the ’Christians of Saint Thomas’.

        Firstly, you are trying to play a Dan Brown by cleverly mixing facts with fiction. While all the information that you’ve given regarding the Synod of Diamper remains accurate, the info on the ancestry of the Syrian Christians (’low caste’ as you stated) is not at all substantiated with any evidence or proof. Having read numerous articles written by eminent historians and researchers, i am convinced of the noble ancestry of the Syrian Christians which was always recognized and accepted by the people of Kerala for many centuries. Therefore, Your claim that strictly lacks proof is simply fit to be thrown into the Bin.

        Let me give you a few of the evidences that confirm the high caste ancestry of the Syrian Christians:

        1. The DNA tests conducted on the members of the Syrian Christian community reveal the presence of the J type Y chromosomal Haplotype, which testify to a Jewish/Assyrian paternal ancestry. More that 40% of the DNA samples showed this trait. Another 40% of the samples showed the presence of R type Y Chromosomal Haplotype, which is clearly indicative of Aryan lineage (Nampoothiri or Nair).

        2. The physical features of MOST Syrian Christians - sharp facial features and fair complexion - something that distinguishes them from the lower castes such as the Mukkuvars, Ezhavas, Paraiyars, Pulayars etc is a clear testimony to the Noble ancestry of the community.

        3. Hindu Rulers of Kerala had always treated the Syrian Christians with great respect and often knighted them with titles such as ’Tharakan’, ’Panikkar’ etc. They were permitted to own large holdings of land, Markets etc. Many Syrian Christian families, especially in the kingdom of Cochin were appointed as Tax collectors and Cheiftains. The local rulers often constructed churches for the Syrian Christians and invited them to settle in newer areas, for the purpose of promoting trade and agriculture.

        4. The early Christian settlements such as the seven places, where Apostle Thomas is believed to have established churches, are all very near to ancient Hindu Temples- something indicative of the conversions of Priestly class hindus to Christianity. Examples of such settlements are Palayoor (near Guruvayoor temple), Nilackal (near Sabarimala Temple), Kodungalloor, Niranom etc.

        5. Occupying the top place in the socio- economic ladder of Kerala, the Syrian Christians are also categorized under the Forward Caste Category by the Govt. of India. No other Christian community in the country is granted this privilege.

        Reply to this message

  • The Syrian Christian Community in Kerala are not converts from fishermen community.St.Thomas,Apostle of Christ,landed at Kodungaloor(Muziris)in 52 AD and converted Jews who settled in Malabar(who came before generations for trade reasons) and high caste hindus to christianity.The place called as chavakkad in Thrissur distict derives its name from shapakad(shapa means curse)as Hindu brahmins cursed those bramins converted to christianity.Till recently orthodox brahmins who travelled via chavakkad never used to bath there.

    Syrian christians enjoied high social status in kerala even practiced a caste system similar to chathurvarnya and untouchability.This practice was condemned even in the synod of diamper(udayamperoor)They were given special rights by the great rulers which only higher class brahmins and kshatriyas enjoied.The cleansing of oil used in temples were only high class hindus could enter were performed by members of syrian christian families

    The majority of syrian churches and communities in kerala are geographically located far from shores though the first churches founded by st.Thomas was near water bodies.The latin rites of Romas Catholic church has more number of people from fishermen community than the syrian division.There are generally no marital relationships between these two communities.

    The term srian christians came to be used since they followed syriac liturgy which is a dialect of Aramic(the language in which Christ preached).The culture of syrian christians of malabar was hindu,their beliefs were christian and rituals were jewish semetic.

    Reply to this message

    • dear juby
      during the time of apostole there was no one called brahmins in kerala.that time buddhism and jainism was strong in kerala.All stories created by the westerners who ruled kerala to give a beautiful idea to get converted to christianity.the syrian christians are mixed race of indians and those pirates and merchants from middle east

      Reply to this message

      • You are absolutely right. Christianity arrived in India with the European colonizers. The fabricated story of early conversion is just a foreign missionary tactic to scorn native Indian traditions and the upper class people in general. I wish these guys maintained their own identity.

        Reply to this message

        • It is true that the Portuguese came to India and made efforts to strenghten christianity followed by the Dutch who did nothing to promote christianity and the British who also promoted the spreading of christianity.But this does not mean that there was no christianity before the advent of the Europeans.The Synod of Nicene in 325 AD bears the signature and seal of Bishop Mar John of Jerusalem(Who was the bishop of Jerusalem and Great India in AD 325 even before the advent of Thomas of Cana 345 AD).The Syrian Christians of Kerala even resisted the moves of Portuguese to compulsorily convert the Jacobite christians to Roman Catholics and resisted the decisions taken in the Synod Of Diamper(1599 AD) and reinstated the Throne of St.Thomas in the year 1663 AD-consecration of Marthoma the First of Pakalomattam family(a family which was converted to christianity from Hindu Brahmins at Palayoor in 52 AD)

          Reply to this message

      • It is not true that Brahmins were not in Kerala during the first century after christ.It is true that Hinduism was weakened due to the influence of Buddhism.Hinduism almost died out.In the 8 th century AD,Sri Shankaracharya(Aadi Shankara) with his visions and missions was able to reinstate hinduism with the implementation of concept of Shankara Narayana.Brahmins were in Kerala right from 1000 BC.

        Syrian Christians enjoied almost all the rights of the Savarna Hindus (High caste hindus)

        Reply to this message

Reply to this article

SPIP | template | | Site Map | Tree | Follow-up of the site's activity RSS 2.0