Home page > Religion & Theology > The danger of Ali-Akbar Jafarey

Point of View

The danger of Ali-Akbar Jafarey

Taken from an editorial note of the 3rd September 2000 issue of the Ushta Newsletter.

Friday 28 July 2006

Do the Parsis who support Ali Jafarey, recognise that the Jafarey group will proceed without scruples, with their long chalked out plan to divide the Zoroastrians of Iranian origin from the Parsis of India? According to Jafarey’s cult, the Parsis are “Hinduized” in their beliefs and in their culture and of course, have been following a different religion for 3000 years.

«Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted, the indifference of those who should have known better, and the silence of the voice of justice, when it mattered most, that has made it possible for evil to triumph» in society (Emperor Haile Selassie of Ethopia).

In the sordid drama that has preceded this World Congress at Houston, a Chamberlain-like compromise has been brought about. The wheels of history however, grind in an inexorable direction of its own. Chamberlain’s “peace with honour”, negotiated with Hitler, brought to mankind, in the 20th century, not just a world engulfed in World War II but the horrors of Auswitch, mass genocide and the scourge of Hitler who ravaged more than half the world. Nazism demanded total allegiance, it brooked no opposition and in its attempt to control the world made them faceless and voiceless. The fate of Europe, in 1939, fellow Zoroastrians, is the fate that awaits the Zoroastrians in North America as it has given Ali Jafarey the official acceptance of FEZANA which he desperately needs to consolidate his rather nebulous Islamic grouping within a Zoroastrian cocoon. Is it not significant that a world congress of the Zoroastrians should become the focal point of such incredible power play?

JPEG - 5.5 kb
Ali Akbar Jafarey

Do the Parsis who support Ali Jafarey, recognise that the Jafarey group will proceed without scruples, with their long chalked out plan to divide the Zoroastrians of Iranian origin from the Parsis of India? According to Jafarey’s cult, the Parsis are “Hinduized” in their beliefs and in their culture and of course, have been following a different religion for 3000 years. Now let us look at what the Jafarey cultists have to say about themselves. They of course, have been following the “pristine” religion of “Asho Zarathushtra” and we the original Zoroastrians with our teachings, rituals and practices, have it totally wrong, and the messiah of the new age, Ali Jafarey, is the only one to who divine truth has been revealed.

This fellow Zoroastrians, is a dangerous phenomenon that North Americans are brewing on their own home ground. By inviting Jafarey, FEZANA is offering to the Zoroastrian Youth of North America, a role model which is antithetical to everything that is representative of our faith on two very important grounds: A) Jafarey has disfigured and changed the prayers in the Khordeh Avesta. This is an undisputed fact as revealed on the net. By accepting him as a speaker, the FEZANA board has set the seal on the right of permitting an individual to distort and change our sacred texts. B) Jafarey has been academically dishonest by claiming to hold a Ph.D. degree from Karachi University. The University has denied awarding a degree to Ali Jafarey. FEZANA, therefore, is lending support to a man of questionable integrity. By accepting him, FEZANA is promoting the untruth.

On these grounds alone, an un-Zoroastrian precedent has been set by FEZANA. Can we have an apex body of the community promoting the Lie over the “Truth-strong word” of Zarathushtra? Whatever be the political compulsions of the situation, should this be the path to take? FEZANA is not alone in promoting Jafarey, the World Zoroastrian Organization (WZO), which wishes to stake its primacy in Zoroastrian affairs, has for a long time been in the forefront of backing and honouring Jafarey, over the years. The compromise has been a dishonourable one, wrought with deceit, political manoeuvring, brandishing of the sword and threats.

Let us take the principle of inclusion, so well touted by these bleeding heart liberals, to its natural conclusion. Since the Jafarey cultists have been given backdoor acceptance, their next logical demand will be for FEZANA membership. After all, Ali Jafarey, is to quote his own words, the Ratu of the Zoroastrians and if he has the right to speak at the Zoroastrian congress, when no other non-Zoroastrian has been invited, then his cult has the right to be part of FEZANA. After all, the principle of inclusion must test itself by its very nature, to the finish. I am sure, FEZANA will, with its liberal “let”s not displease anyone’ philosophy, go out of its way to accept the Jafarey cult. The next step to follow soon after, will be for Ali Jafarey to stand for FEZANA presidency and we could have him voted in by the North Americans who are so insistent about inclusion.

However remote this may seem, the hijacking of Zoroastrian associations, is the immediate game plan of the “Jafareyists”; otherwise where else would they find a place under the Sun, certainly not under the banner of Islam? How will they achieve it? By broadening the already existing cultural and linguistic divide between the Iranians and the Parsis. Every effort will be made by the Jafareyists to widen this gulf and increase Iranian hatred towards the Parsis. Unfortunately, a small coterie of Parsis have vociferously used the net to promote Ali Jafarey. This is a stand based on hypocrisy for, how many of them who support him, would for instance, want Ali Jafarey to perform their children’s navjotes or weddings or for that matter, perform their death rites? The Iranian Zoroastrians, on the other hand, must choose whether they owe allegiance to the language and culture of Iran which they share with Ali Jafarey, or do they wish to uphold the religion of Zarathushtra at all costs.

Manekji Limji Hataria, Ardeshir Edulji Reporter, the Panday family, Dinshaw Petit, Kay-Khosro Shahrokh, Dinshaw Irani, and a host of other Zoroastrians did everything to bring the Iranis and Parsis together at time when Irandian Zoroastrians were ruthlessly persecuted by the Qajars in Iran. Their efforts, are now being consigned to the dustbin of history, by the promotion of Jafareyism.

Perhaps it is worth noting, that among the great and good of Iran, there was pride in being associated with the Parsis. Kay-Khosro Shahrokh, perhaps the most famous Zoroastrian, addressed himself as “a pure Parsi from Kerman”. This is something to think about and lastly in modern times, when Zoroastrian Iranians were stranded in India and Pakistan, it was a Parsi group, Zoroastrian Studies, which initiated, spearheaded and helped the largest single contingent of displaced Iranian Zoroastrians to migrate to North America and certainly not Mr Jafarey, who in fact, persistently worked against it. It is time for Iranian Zoroastrians and Parsis to unite and sweep out the forces of disintegration or face religious and cultural disintegration. Let North American members of FEZANA not become the architects of disaster and cultural suicide.

P.S.

This editorial has been written for creating Iranian and Parsi unity and is part of a three-part initiative towards bringing harmony in the Zoroastrian community.

9 Forum messages

  • The danger of Ali-Akbar Jafarey 12 December 2006 06:33, by Hamilton Martin Sarain

    As an outsider to the Zartoshti religion, I find Mr. Jafarey’s teachings to be quite refreshing. His interpretation of the Gathas of Zarathushtra presents a progressive and universally humanistic religion and philosophy, so I was attracted to his teachings, and other articles at http://www.vohuman.org

    I am a student of religions, yet I am also a lonely freethinker who is very attracted to the teachings of the progressive followers of Zarathushtra. I have have various reasons for not joining the Baha’i faith. I’m fed up with the strife between Muslims, Christians, and Jews, and some of the ridiculous prophecies, espeacially the pre-millenial Rapture doctrine of some Christian denominations, offer no hope for a sustainable lifestyle here on earth for the coming generations. I read through the articles at the vohuman website and thought that this may be a group of decent modest people that I can join with, and pursue some kind of family life. Yet I feel like I’m an outsider, and I also live with the added stigma of being a fatherless child from a poor family who didn’t take full advantage of the educational opportunities. I am a simple working man, and it seems that I only read of Parsis and Zoroastrians who are successful and well-off. Everyone boasts of the accomplished and wealthy members of their particular religious or ethnic groups, but what of the less successful, less wealthy individuals and families that are decent people who live according to the good teachings of Zarathushtra.

    I see now that I am an outsider to your religion. I am an outsider to all traditional culutres and religions. I grew up in a community of Spiritualists, some of whom claim psychic powers and claim to communicate with spirits of the dead. I left those Spiritualists and I will never go back to that ’druj’. Now I am a very lonely progressive freethinker with a relatively low socio-economic status. I’m made to think that I don’t earn enough to be married with a good woman, live some kind of humble family life, and contribute how I can to the furtherment of the good principle, to live in a good way.

    I saw a glimmer of hope when I learned that the Zoroastrian Assembly is located so close to where I live. Now I feel shut out. I’m 34 years old and I’ve never been married. I’ve never been in love. I have very little experience when it comes to intimacy with women. I have been waiting to meet a good woman for a loving relationship, but I was looking in the wrong places, and now I don’t know where to go. I don’t want to be like a monk or some eccentric hermit.

    Well then... That’s my bad ’bakht’ I suppose. I just pray that I make good choices from here on.

    Be well all.

    Reply to this message

    • The danger of Ali-Akbar Jafarey 19 January 2007 15:54, by Jose Crespo

      Dear Hamilton:
      May I suggest that you study, reflect, learn, pray to God for guidance and illumination; and then, following your heart, create your own way. Your own particular way. Keep searching. Be certain that God will guide you. Maybe some other people our there feel like you do. They might become your group, your community. It happens sometimes that we do not find our place in any of the established religious forms of this world. Be well!

      Reply to this message

  • The danger of Ali-Akbar Jafarey 12 December 2006 06:39, by Hamilton Martin Sarain

    I follow up because I forgot to mention that I am fatherless, and my mother passed away in October of 1999. I am a lonely outsider. I used to smoke marijuana and frequent social circles of individuals that lived their lives out of balance. I have struggled with bad influences since I was a child. You people won’t help me. I don’t know where to go. I’m not some mystic. I just want to live a simple life with good people, decent people, modest people.

    That is all.

    Reply to this message

    • The danger of Ali-Akbar Jafarey 29 September 2007 19:03, by Hamilton Sarain

      I offer up all my doubts to Our Father in heaven, Creator of all things visible and invisible. Lord Jesus Christ have mercy on me, a poor sinner. I repent. I renounce all false religions, false prophecies, and deceiving heresies. Through prayer and fasting in Christ Jesus, Father let the demons be cast out.

      Lord, have mercy!

      Reply to this message

    • The danger of Ali-Akbar Jafarey 19 December 2010 10:51, by mary

      You should not give up in your search, from your letter you sound better educated than you say-there are many different interpretations of Zarathustra’s message and i find both the Parsi version and Mr.Jafarey’s
      version both helpful in different ways, i feel this article was too harsh on Mr Jafarey but since i find both his intrepretation, the Iranian and the Parsi interpretations helpful, i wish to criticise none of them-find what suits you best and follow this-the words of Zarathustra are actually timeless-and i hope you find happiness in this

      Reply to this message

  • The danger of Ali-Akbar Jafarey 19 March 2008 07:48

    Jafari is right there is a clear divide between the Parsi’s and true Zoroastrians. Parsi’s have become adulterated with the hindu faith and customs from their massacre of the holy Gathas to their misinterpretation of the Avesta I am truly shamed to be assocated with the Parsi’s and wish them to sever all ties from true Zartoshti’s. The threat to the Zoroastrian faith lies NOT with Iranians who are coming back to their roots but in those who pompously taut their holier than thou attitude of our once pure Zartoshti faith.

    Reply to this message

    • The danger of Ali-Akbar Jafarey 8 January 2011 14:17, by arjang

      Doctor Jafarey is one of the finest men I know.. He is doing a great service by bringing the message of Zarthosht to all people. Those who vilify him are being very unfair and doing this good man a disservice.

      Remember before the fall of Sassanids Zarthoshti religion was open. It got closed mostly due to pressure from Islamic authorities. Now some have taken that to heart and refuse to accept others.

      Becoming a Zartoshti requires a personal choice based on understanding. You must accept it with an open heart and an open mind. Not due to your genetics or what your ancestors did generations ago. Personal responsibly; personal choice.

      Reply to this message

  • The danger of Ali-Akbar Jafarey 10 February 2011 17:53, by Nima Sepassi

    Ali Akbar Jafarey is a human being like the rest of us. He has a right to speak his mind. As Zoroastrians we should listen to the 3rd Hymn of Zoroaster and decide for ourselves if we agree or disagree with Dr. Jafarey.

    On a side note, whomever submitted this article in the Ushta Newsletter may have some valid points however they neglected to put their own name on it. I ask the reader to judge for themselves: If the writing was worth an iota of truth, if it was Asha, wouldn’t the author claim ownership?

    Reply to this message

  • The danger of Ali-Akbar Jafarey 29 April 2012 17:02, by Nima Sepassi

    My dear reader:

    I can’t say I agree with everything Mobad Ali-Akbar Jafarey says either, however he is a very sweet old man and he does have some real gems of knowledge that have really opened my eyes.

    Most people seem to have issue with his adherence to the Gat’has. Quite frankly it’s not the whole Avesta that was written by the brilliant Zarathustra (aka Zoroaster), it was the Gat’has. Those among us who call ourselves Zoroastrians should appreciate that the Gat’has were written by the man responsible for bringing us back to the worship of one god. The Avestas, due to their old age, have become mythological tales. Only those well versed in the discipline of Mythology, or who have at least read the works of Joseph Campbell, can properly interpret such things.

    Second, I strongly believe that it is the Sassanian dynasty that can take credit for losing our country to the invading Arabs. With Yazdegard’s nasty bad word letter and the Sassanians lack of value given to the Gat’has it’s no wonder our people lost so much land, history and culture. Thank the supreme wisdom we got it back.

    The third thing that comes to mind is that I’ve heard from a close friend of his that he was well accepted in the community until he converted a black man to our belief system. Honestly, when did our people become such racists? Can this nasty form of collectivism be another weight contributing to the sinking our "ship"?

    Fourth, "long chalked out plan"? Seriously? Is the author of the original post such a conspiracy theorist to come up with such ludicrous hyposis? OK, ok, I’ll admit that we’ve become seperated, but if there is any evidence that it was actually planned, I’m all ears.

    Reply to this message

Reply to this article

SPIP | template | | Site Map | Tree | Follow-up of the site's activity RSS 2.0